The world leaders gather for the climate - accused of greenwashing
Of:
Adrian Ericson,
Olivia J Berntsson
Published: Today 18.34
Updated: Less than 2 hours ago
NEWS
Leaders from around the world gather in Egypt to find solutions to the
climate crisis.
But Greta Thunberg snubs the climate summit COP27 - which is sponsored
by Coca-Cola.
- We still have a lot of work to do, says Swedish chief negotiator
Mattias Frumerie.
On Sunday, COP27, this year's UN negotiations on the climate, began in
the Egyptian tourist resort of Sharm el-Sheikh. Tens of thousands of
names are on the guest list, ranging from world leaders to activists.
The conditions are dark. The goal in the Paris Agreement is to limit
global warming to 1.5 degrees - but instead greenhouse gas emissions
continue to increase. The world is moving towards a warming of 2.5
degrees.
- I see it as my job to believe that we can stay below 1.5 degrees of
warming, but we still have a lot of work to do, says Swedish chief
negotiator Mattias Frumerie, who is on site in Sharm el-Sheikh.
The hope is that COP27 will lead to the goals of the Paris Agreement
being translated into concrete action.
- We assess that the meeting will mainly be characterized by four
questions. It is about continued work to reduce emissions, about climate
adaptation, climate financing and what we call damages and losses in
the negotiations, says Mattias Frumerie.
Sweden's chief negotiator Mattias Frumerie. Photo: Maja Suslin/TT
Facts
COP27 and the Paris
Agreement
The UN climate summit COP27 is held in Sharm el-Sheikh in Egypt from
6-18 November.
In the Paris Agreement of 2015, most of the world's countries agreed to
keep the increase in the global average temperature well below 2
degrees, and most preferably below 1.5 degrees, compared to
pre-industrial times.
But the countries' plans to reduce their emissions of greenhouse gases
are far from sufficient to limit warming to 1.5 degrees, according to a
compilation that the UN climate secretariat UNFCCC has made of all
climate plans ahead of the meeting. If the plans are followed, the world
is instead headed for around 2.5 degrees of warming before the end of
the century.
Source: TT
The meeting is held in Sharm el-Sheikh in Egypt. Photo: Javad Parsa /
NTB
The US and the EU are skeptical about compensation
A burning issue is the requirement to establish a special fund for
climate damages. It is about severely affected countries wanting
compensation from rich countries that caused the climate crisis. But
there both the EU and the US say no.
Sweden enters the negotiations with high expectations and the ambition
to highlight innovative solutions to change, says Mattias Frumerie.
- We base it a lot on the story we can convey from the Swedish side
today with, for example, fossil-free steel and restructuring in the
financial and transport sectors.
But despite Sweden being far ahead in international comparison, not
enough is being done to change society. With current measures, the
country's climate goals will not be reached, according to the Swedish
Environmental Protection Agency.
The climate summit began on Sunday. Photo: Peter Dejong / AP
Greta Thunberg: "Greenwashing"
The climate meeting has also met with opposition. Greta Thunberg does
not go to Egypt and comes with sharp criticism. The world leaders bask
in the glory instead of acting, says Thunberg to The Guardian.
- The climate meetings are mainly used as an opportunity for leaders and
people with power to get attention by using various forms of
greenwashing.
A fact that caused strong reactions is that the climate meeting is
sponsored by the multinational company Coca-Cola. Climate organizations
emphasize that Coca-Cola is one of the world's largest consumers of
plastic.
- It is astonishing that a company so closely linked to the fossil fuel
industry is allowed to sponsor a vital climate meeting, says Emma
Priestland from the organization Break Free From Plastic to The Guardian.
Coca-Cola assures that the company is committed to issues of site
littering and sustainability.
When Aftonbladet talks to chief negotiator Mattias Frumerie, he has not
yet heard about the soft drink giant's sponsorship.
- That's exactly what I haven't noticed. But there have been issues over
the years with sponsors that the presidency chooses, it is not
something that we other parties are involved in. Then it is clear that
we can address it in different ways if we feel that it would be a
problem.
Which may be the case.
- We can look into that, says Frumerie.
Greta Thunberg boycotts the climate summit. Photo: Paul Wennerholm/TT
The researcher: "Big boat to turn"
The climate meetings have so far failed to bring about the change
required. Despite that, the negotiations are important, says Markku
Rummukainen, professor of climatology at Lund University.
- I think we would be significantly worse off without the climate negotiations. It is important for climate work. But of course, since it is the countries themselves that decide what to do, it becomes important what happens in the countries between the meetings.
The climate negotiations can support the countries' efforts, according to Rummukainen. Although the situation is critical globally, the climate scientist sees some bright spots. Partly because energy from the sun and wind has become increasingly cheaper. Partly because some countries have shown that it is possible to reduce emissions.
- But as I said, it's a big boat to turn. It takes time. Then all work, every meeting, all decisions made by countries, companies and citizens are important, says Rummukainen.
Markku Rummukainen, professor of climatology at Lund University. Photo: Karin Wesslén / TT
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar