Emergency laws test the limits of democracy in Chile

 

Mattias Mächs/TT

Published 18.24

 

 Chilean President José Antonio Kast, center, in conversation with Argentine President Javier Milei during the inauguration of their ideological ally, Colombia's new president Abelardo de la Espriella, on August 7. Photo: Matias Delacroix/AP/TT

Chilean right-wing leader José Antonio Kast came to power promising an iron fist against criminals.

But a new proposal for far-reaching emergency laws is drawing criticism even from within his own ranks.

Like several other recently inaugurated right-wing presidents in Latin America, Kast has drawn inspiration from El Salvador's authoritarian leader Nayib Bukele in the fight against organized crime.

The government recently published its own photos of how nearly 300 high-risk prisoners were moved to a new large prison.

– We are sending a clear message to criminals that things have changed, Kast said in connection with the move.

– We will hunt you down, and we will find you.

Shifting gears

But after dissatisfaction from supporters that the pace of reform since the government took office in March has not matched the campaign rhetoric, Kast has tried to shift gears. In early August, a package of laws was presented that gives the state increased powers in crime prevention.

Among the measures are the permanent deployment of police forces in certain areas, harsher penalties for gang membership and fewer restrictions on the use of force by the police.

It also includes changes to the constitution – so that the president, without seeking support from Congress, can declare a state of emergency for up to eight months.

“Doesn’t want to sacrifice everything”

Several experts condemn the proposal as both unnecessarily far-reaching and a threat to democratic principles. The possibility of restricting freedoms is particularly controversial in a country still reeling from the brutal 1973-1990 dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet.

The proposal is also divisive among the government’s supporting parties, several of which are demanding changes.

The leader of the center-right Evopolis party, Luciano Cruz-Coke, questions “the false assumption that people are prepared to sacrifice everything for security.”

Kast dismisses criticism that he is steering the country in an “illiberal” direction.

But he is open to changing things like the timeframe for a state of emergency.

“You can modify that, if that’s the problem,” he said in an interview on Monday. 

 

TOP NEWS

North Korea-South Korea Relations
Analysis: Trump's unexpected announcement shakes Asia

Donald Trump's decision to cancel planned military exercises with South Korea is causing concern among other Asian countries, several Reuters writers write in an analysis.

Japan worries about ending up in Trump's firing line, Taiwan is closely monitoring the upcoming US-China meeting and India is becoming increasingly uncertain about what strategic role they play for the president, they write.

SVT's Stefan Åsberg notes that the South Korean government officially says that Trump's rapprochement with North Korea gives diplomacy a greater chance. But beneath the surface there is concern and a "deep domestic political conflict." Left-wing forces want dialogue while conservatives want to see military deterrence in relations with the neighboring country.

- The decision came completely without warning, which creates uncertainty, he says. 

Trump's USA  American public opinion
Poll: Trust in Trump continues to plummet

American voters' trust in Donald Trump has reached a new low, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll.

65 percent say they have no trust in the president. This is an increase of 24 percentage points since he took office, and an increase of 4 percentage points in the past month.

The same poll shows that an increasing proportion – more than eight in ten – believe that the Iran war will not end anytime soon. 

The climate threat Global challenges
Report: New oil damages the climate and the economy

The UK's plans for increased oil and gas production would not only hit the climate but also be an economic loss in the long term, according to an analysis by Imperial College University in London. The Guardian reports.

The increased carbon dioxide emissions would, according to calculations, lead to economic damage of hundreds of billions of pounds in the coming decades.

According to the newspaper, this is probably an underestimate, as the analysis does not take into account factors such as rising sea levels and extreme weather. One of the arguments for the plans has been that it would be a plus deal, as household energy costs would be reduced and more jobs would be created.

 

LtCOL. Karen Kwiatkowski : The Cost of Genocide

Judge Napolitano - Judging Freedom

 

Matt Hoh : What’s Wrong With the Navy?

Judge Napolitano - Judging Freedom

 

 

Aaron Maté : Why the US Does No Diplomacy

Judge Napolitano - Judging Freedom

 

Prof John Mearsheimer : Why Britain Uses Ukraine to Attack Russia

Judge Napolitano - Judging Freedom

 

Middle East Crisis Iran War

China Defies US New Iran Strategy: “Must Not Be Disrupted”

China is hitting back at the US’s new sanctions campaign against Iran, saying that the country’s economic relationship with Iran must not be “disrupted or undermined,” Bloomberg reports. The statement comes just hours after the Trump administration imposed new sanctions on Chinese companies and threatened to take action against a major financial institution for its ties to Iran.

According to Bloomberg, the conflict risks deepening the contradictions between the world’s two largest economies. At the same time, the Wall Street Journal notes that the US’s new strategy “Operation Economic Outcast” is formally aimed at Iran, even though the initial measures include Chinese companies.

Sources: Gabbard Warned Trump Before the War

The then US intelligence chief Tulsi Gabbard warned Donald Trump about how Iran would react if Ali Khamenei, who was then the country’s supreme leader, was killed. This is according to sources for the Wall Street Journal.

Days before the war began, she said it would likely lead to a more hard-line regime, and that the Strait of Hormuz would be closed. She also said that Iran would likely attack US allies in the Middle East, and that it could have effects on how the US is viewed as an ally.

The war began a couple of days later and has been going on for six months.

Gabbard left her post this spring.

Analysis: Why didn't Donald Trump do this before he bombed Iran?

The fact that the US is now introducing strong economic measures with the aim of isolating Iran is a sign that Donald Trump and his administration have lost patience. That's what Sky News correspondent Mark Stone says. He believes that the US's warfare has not had the desired effect.

- They are well aware that they are in a difficult position militarily and that they cannot get out of this conflict.

There is no doubt that the US economic offensive will hit Iran hard, according to SVT's Middle East correspondent Samir Abu Eid. However, the measures will not lead to the fall of the regime, he predicts.

Iran has learned over several decades to live with harsh US sanctions.

- Iran's response will primarily be to keep the strategically important Strait of Hormuz closed and in this way try to pressure the US to the negotiating table, says Samir Abu Eid.

The US's actions raise many questions, says David E Sanger in the New York Times. He mainly wonders why Trump did not introduce these measures before attacking Iran.

"President Trump and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent are resorting to another strategy to tentatively try to get out of a failed military adventure," he writes.