fredag 26 april 2024

The monsoon rains in Africa

Kenya 

The death toll rises after the monsoon rains in Africa

TT-AFP

Published 2024-04-26 18.30


Vulnerable people in Nairobi, Kenya, receive help from the Red Cross. Photo: Edaward Odero/AP/TT

The death toll continues to rise after the severe rains in East Africa. Authorities in Kenya said on Friday that more than 70 people have died since the seasonal monsoon rains began in March. 120,000 inhabitants are directly affected and have been forced to leave their homes.

In the capital Nairobi, about 30 deaths are reported this week alone

The East African land area of the Rift Valley has also reported several deaths due to the monsoon rains.

Neighboring Tanzania states that more than 150 people are dead due to floods and landslides and that 200,000 inhabitants are directly affected.

This year's rainy season in East Africa has coincided with the progress of the El Niño weather phenomenon. At the same time, the region is recovering from the worst drought in four decades.

.......................................

Close to 200 dead in East Africa's torrential rains

TT-AFP

Published 2024-04-25 14.09

En kvinna sitter på en soffa utanför sitt översvämmade hus i den informella bosättningen Mathare i Kenyas huvudstad Nairobi.
A woman sits on a sofa outside her flooded house in the Mathare informal settlement in the Kenyan capital, Nairobi. Photo: Brian Inganga/AP/TT

At least 155 people have died as a result of floods and landslides caused by heavy downpours in Tanzania. The storm has also claimed several lives in neighboring Kenya.

In Tanzania, around 200,000 people are estimated to be affected by the progress of the storm, according to Prime Minister Kassim Majaliwa. Fields, homes and other infrastructure are said to have been destroyed in the rain.

In Kenya's capital, Nairobi, tens of people have died. Several more are missing, according to local police. The floods have caused chaos in the city of millions, with roads and bridges blocked and homes in informal settlements under water.

Kenyan President William Ruto states that people in the worst affected areas will be relocated. Tens of thousands have already been evacuated.

Tanzania's neighboring country Burundi – one of the world's poorest countries – has also been badly affected by the torrential rains. Rising water levels in the great Lake Tanganyika have caused a river to overflow and caused extensive damage to infrastructure, AP reports.

This year's rainy season in East Africa has coincided with the progress of the El Niño weather phenomenon. At the same time, the region is recovering from the worst drought in four decades.

.............................................

Extensive flooding in East Africa

TT-AP

Published 2024-04-23 02.46

En by i Kenya har svämmats över efter omfattande skyfall.
A village in Kenya has been flooded after heavy rainfall. Photo: Brian Ongoro/AP/TT

National parks, ports and highways are under water after extensive flooding caused by torrential downpours in several East African countries.

Worst hit is Burundi, where the country's interior minister is now asking its development partners to "help all the people affected by these disasters" together with Burundi.

Over 200,000 people have been affected between September and the beginning of April this year. 19,250 homes and 209 classrooms have been destroyed.

Meanwhile, 35 people have died in Kenya since mid-March and more than 100,000 people have been affected by floods, according to the United Nations citing the latest figures from the Red Cross.

Kenya's meteorological authorities expect the peak of the rainfall to arrive this week.

According to climate scientists, the widespread flooding is due to the El Niño weather phenomenon.

Latest news

The election in the United States|The electoral movement
Biden and Trump ready for debate: 'Anytime'

ข่าว ‘วอยซ์ทีวี’ ประกาศปิดกิจการ

6 ชม. 
‘วอยซ์ทีวี’ ประกาศปิดกิจการ จะทยอยหยุดออกอากาศภายในเดือนหน้า และจะจ่ายชดเชยให้พนักงานทุกคนตามกฎหมายอย่างเป็นธรรม
.

 อาจเป็นรูปภาพของ ข้อความ

ข่าว โปรดเกล้าฯ ให้ถอดยศทหาร-เรียกคืนเครื่องราชอิสริยาภรณ์

1 ชม. 
โปรดเกล้าฯ ให้ถอดยศทหาร-เรียกคืนเครื่องราชอิสริยาภรณ์ จำนวน 8 ราย
.

 

อาจเป็นรูปภาพของ ข้อความ

The Politics X อ.ศิโรตม์ 26 เม.ย.67


The Politics X อ.ศิโรตม์ : 26 เม.ย.67 I สนทนา "แมว-ประกิต" : แบรนด์เพื่อไทย ไม่ขลัง?

 

Economy

The Fed vs Inflation
US inflation unchanged - market relief

Is today's announcement even a bet?

 

The Defense Committee

53 billion – is it even a bet?

Niclas Vent

Reporter

This is a commenting text. Analysis and positions are the writer's.

Updated 14.47 | Published 14.34


Big, bad Putin's foul breath is getting more and more intrusive.

Then 53 billion extra per year will be spent on equipping the straw house of the Swedish defence.

But not the phase, it is enough for a house made of bricks.

We can only hope that reality does not come to huff and puff.

Is it a crisis?

If you listen to what the politicians say, the answer is yes. Actually the most serious situation since the Second World War, according to Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson (M).

A stream of politicians and experts are now counting the now counting the number of years we have to get ready for a Russian attack west on the fingers of one hand.

But words and reality tend to be different things.

British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak announced the other day an increase in defense spending to 2.5 percent of GDP by 2030. The country's industry is to be put "on a war footing."

Oh well. In that case, it must be about a very small war. Or a very small foot.

During World War II, Britain's defense spending peaked at over 50 percent of GDP.

Sweden, safely outside the conflict, was at 12–13 percent.

See there, what war feet really cost.

Försvarsberedningens ordförande Hans Wallmark (M) under en pressträff på fredagen där försvarsberedningens slutbetänkande presenteras.
The defense committee's chairman Hans Wallmark (M) during a press conference on Friday where the defense committee's final report is presented. Photo: Claudio Bresciani/TT

In 2030, Sweden's defense spending should be up to 2.6 percent of GDP - SEK 52.8 billion more than today.
 
That was suggested by the Defense Committee today.

Is it a bet?

We still don't even have the defense that politicians decided we would build four years ago.

The army's four brigades are not ready. We now have one, barely two. Robotic air defenses on the corvettes are not installed. No new corvettes have been ordered. Anti-aircraft systems for the brigades have not been purchased.

Much of the money will simply go to completing the defenses we thought we needed before major war broke out in Europe.

Before Iranian weapons started bombing maritime traffic on the Red Sea.

Before we gave away military equipment worth SEK 30 billion to Ukraine.

Before an orange man with a weird haircut threatened to storm back into the White House and knock the legs out of NATO.

Soldater uppställda då P7 Revingehed. Arkivbild.
Soldiers stationed then P7 Revingehed. Archive image. Photo: Johan Nilsson/TT

It all depends on how you look at it.

If this is a real turning point - a "pre-war period" as both Polish President Donald Tusk and Sweden's Chief of Defense Staff Michael Claesson say - then it will not be enough to meet the demands of the outside world step by step, with the eyes rather on what the treasury is capable of than what is needed.

War is disrespectful that way. It does not wait for us step by step to build the ability to face it.

However, it is easy to understand the resistance.

Defense is the place where politicians' dreams come to die.

Every penny for carbines that should ideally never have to be fired in harm's way is a penny that cannot go to climate change, healthcare, schools or reduced taxes.

No one becomes a politician to shovel billions into a bottomless pit, where the results are only noticeable when you yourself have retired.

If we are lucky, it will "only" have passed 14 years after the order before Sweden's two new submarines are delivered.

Who survives so many years in top politics?

The trade-offs are not easy. Defense is not exactly Sweden's only need. But the question cannot be whether we can afford it. The only question is where the money will be taken from.

There awaits a political conflict that has not yet been fought.
..........................................

The argument about the money for defense

In 2030, defense will cost an extra 53 billion a year.

S, V and MP demand a special tax on the rich to plug the hole in state finances - something that the governing parties reject.

- You cannot live on expenses alone, says Peter Hultqvist (S).
The defense committee, where all parties in the Riksdag are represented, today agreed on a new long-term plan for Sweden's defence.

Most things were agreed upon:

All in all, this means that 2.6 percent of Sweden's GDP goes to military defense in 2030, according to NATO's way of calculating. Today, the expenditure corresponds to 2.2 percent of GDP.

Tax for the richest

But where the money will come from is not clear.

- The amounts are so large that they risk crowding out other needs in the treasury. There is a risk that care, school and care will be affected, says Peter Hultqvist (S).

S, V and MP therefore want a special contingency tax for the richest to pay for part of the increase.

Peter Hultqvist (S).
Peter Hultqvist (S). Photo: Peter Wixtröm

The parties want it to target high income earners with large capital gains. It could bring in around SEK 15 billion, according to Peter Hultqvist.

- It is not unknown that the economic gaps in Sweden have increased quite substantially and that the higher strata have had much better economic conditions. We believe that a tax like this, where these groups can contribute to the defense, will not cause any major problems, says Peter Hultqvist.

Hanna Gunnarsson, the Left Party's defense policy spokesperson:

- I think there are many highly paid people in Sweden who want to join and pay for a stronger total defense. This is not the time for tax cuts. We need more money in the system, she says.

The criticism: "Not the right way"

The governing parties and SD are completely cold-hearted about the proposal. Nor is C behind.

- The Social Democrats have thrown the funding issue into the Defense Committee, it has never been the Defense Committee's responsibility, not even when Peter Hultqvist was Minister of Defence, says Anna Starbrink, the Liberals' defense policy spokesperson.

Anna Starbrink (L).
Anna Starbrink (L). Photo: Jessica Gow/TT

- This is a way for him to try to push through a contingency tax, which from my perspective is just a relaunch of the old defense tax that the Liberals helped abolish. That's not the right way to do it. The financing of this much money must take place in a collective approach in the state budget. There it is about priorities and using the budget space that is available.

The defense committee also wants to see an investment in civil defense - but the proposal is far from the needs described by the Norwegian Agency for Community Safety and Preparedness (MSB).

Covering the needs would cost SEK 32 billion per year until 2030, according to MSB.

The defense committee proposes an increase of an average of NOK 6.5 billion per year during the same period - which thus covers 20 percent of the identified needs.

FACTS

The Defense Committee's proposal

Three mechanized brigades and one infantry brigade essentially operational by 2030.

A new field unit, Norrland's infantry regiment, in the war organization.

Training of conscripts is increased from 8,000 to 10,000 in 2030 and 12,000 in 2032.

The navy's personnel is reinforced.

Expanded anti-aircraft capability.

Investment in air bases to be able to spread out the combat aircraft.

More ammo and spare parts, more hunting and cruising robots.

New territorial units, organized into about twenty companies and platoons.

More refresher training for war organization requirements.

Reinforcement to the voluntary defense organizations.

Expansion of officer training.

Source: TT/The Defense Committee

FACTS

That's how big the defense budget should be

2025: 135 billion (bdr)

2026: 142 months

2027: 153 bd

2028: 171 bd

2029: 175 bd

2030: 185 billion

Footnote: In current prices

Source: TT/The Defense Committee

Latest news

The election in India
Indian Muslim: We defend the mosque with our lives

The election in the United States

The election in the United States|The electoral movement

The Russian Invasion

The Russian InvasionThe Battles

The Israel-Hamas war

Live! #ตาสว่างกว่า 26 เม.ย.

Live! #ตาสว่างกว่า วอยซ์ทีวีปิดกิจการเลิกจ้างจ่อ 100 คน จับตาทหารพม่าโค่นมิงอ่องลาย Ep.142 26 เม.ย.

 

torsdag 25 april 2024

Climate & environment

 

HD decision: The Aurora case receives permission to appeal

300 young people hope to bring forward their class action

Christina Nordh

Updated 18.31 | Published 18.31
 
Klimataktivisten och juristen Ida Edling framför Högsta domstolen i Stockholm förra året. Hon är en av de tre unga som stämt staten för bristande klimatpolitik.
Climate activist and lawyer Ida Edling before the Supreme Court in Stockholm last year. She is one of the three young people who sued the state for lack of climate policy. Photo: Anna Tärnhuvud

The Supreme Court grants the Aurora case permission to appeal.

The case, where a group of young people has sued the Swedish state for a lack of climate policy, may later be taken up in court.

- This means that the Supreme Court must decide whether it is possible to bring such an action in a Swedish court. An examination of the class action in the district court's case can therefore only become relevant after the Supreme Court has answered the question of whether the action can be tried, says Anders Eka, chairman of the Supreme Court, in a press release.
 
Sued the government

The organization Aurora has sued the Swedish government and claims that the climate work is not sufficient and is against the European Convention.

The Chancellor of Justice (JK), who represents the state, has requested that the Aurora case be dismissed and the district court has referred the matter to HD. Today's announcement from HD means that the court must decide whether the case can be taken up for consideration, writes TT.

The petition was submitted in November 2022 by roughly 600 Swedish children and young people. One of them is climate activist Greta Thunberg.
 
Greta Thunberg utanför riksdagen i augusti 2018 då hon inledde sin skolstrejk för klimatet.
Greta Thunberg outside the Riksdag in August 2018 when she started her school strike for the climate. Photo: Naina Helen W. Well

The EU can adopt the disputed law

 

Migration policy

The EU can copy the British Rwanda plan - if it works

Wolfgang Hansson

This is a commenting text. Analysis and positions are the writer's.

Published 19.09

The obstacles to sending asylum seekers to Rwanda have been removed.

The first boat refugees will be flown from the UK to Kigali within weeks.

While human rights organizations are up in arms, EU leaders will follow the experiment with great interest. They themselves have similar plans.
 
Quick version

Photo: Toby Melville/AP
The Conservative government in Great Britain wants to put an end to the rickety boats with refugees making their way from France to the British Isles. The number has increased sharply in recent years. Last year, 30,000 migrants came that way.
When the Supreme Court unanimously ruled out plans to send refugees to Rwanda, the government enacted a new law that allows anyone who crosses the sea illegally to be flown to Rwanda to have their asylum claims heard there. If they are granted asylum, it gives them the right to stay in Rwanda. Not in the UK.

Critics rage against the plans, which they believe violate the refugee conventions to which Britain is a signatory.

Big questions are also being raised about whether Rwanda can be considered a safe country for refugees.

The British government sees it as a way of discouraging would-be refugees from making the dangerous journey across the English Channel. If they know from the beginning that their journey ends in Rwanda, the number of migrants will decrease.

The experiment, it is difficult to call it anything else, will be followed very closely by the leaders of the EU.

The EU has just adopted a major migration package. It also involves trying to reduce the flow of refugees to Europe, but without sending the asylum seekers to countries outside the EU.
 
Deter migrants

But several countries are already brooding over plans similar to those of the British.

On site in Rwanda, Denmark has examined the possibilities of reaching an agreement similar to the UK's. Italy has signed an agreement with Albania that a large number of those who go to Italy will instead have their applications examined in Albania.

The EU has also held talks with several countries in North Africa about various measures to reduce the flow of refugees to Europe. Since 2016, the EU has been paying Turkey to give more than three million refugees sanctuary and prevent them from reaching Europe.

The EU's basic problem is the same as that of the British. Today, there are no countries in Europe that want to accept refugees in large numbers. Yet they continue to arrive in the hundreds of thousands every year.

The EU, like the British, wants to discourage people from seeking Europe, especially the dangerous boat route across the Mediterranean where several thousand migrants drown every year.

But they have not yet managed to reach an agreement between all 27 countries about outsourcing the asylum process to countries outside Europe. A number of EU countries think it is going too far.

But that does not prevent them from following the British Rwanda project with great interest.
 
Asylum center for Europe

If it turns out that it works as a deterrent, my tip is that the EU will soon try to enter into contracts with a number of countries in North Africa that can act as asylum centers for Europe.

As with Rwanda, the main carrot will be money and better relations with Europe. The British are paying close to five billion kroner for Rwanda to receive a number of thousands of refugees over five years. The more they receive, the more money.

Those who created the asylum rules after the Second World War that are still in place today did not foresee that the system would develop into a criminal business where refugees and migrants pay large sums of money to be helped to get to attractive countries.

This has resulted in people who are not fleeing because of political persecution, war or famine still wanting to get to Europe for a better life.

The result is a situation where many Europeans feel that there is a controlled immigration where the authorities have no control over who is coming. Which in turn resulted in an immigration-critical electorate in many countries.

A large number of war refugees from Ukraine has not exactly increased the appetite for receiving non-European immigrants.
 
No chance

The politician in Europe who today goes to the polls on a refugee-friendly policy has no chance. The government that wants to be re-elected must show that they can stop uncontrolled immigration.

It is considered to be the main driving force of British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak. The conservatives are heavily trailing in opinion polls ahead of the elections to be held later this year, probably in October. If Sunak succeeds on the migration issue, it could possibly prevent an otherwise given victory for Labour.

Even in many EU countries, the issue of migration is burning before the EU elections in June. As in the USA before the presidential election this autumn.

But there is no guarantee that the Rwanda track will stop the flow of refugees.

Men det finns ingen garanti för att Rwandaspåret kommer att få stopp på flyktingströmmen.

TOP NEWS

The Russian invasion|The response of the outside world
Putin visits China in May

The Israel-Hamas warThe demonstrations

 

สงครามตัวแทนในยูเครนจากวันที่ ๒๔ ก.พ ๖๕ ถึงวันที่ ๒๔ เม.ย. ๖ ๗

 

ครบสองปีกว่าของสงครามตัวแทนในยูเครน.....



 เริ่มจากวันที่ ๒๔ กุมภาพันธ์ ๒๕๖๕ ถึงวันที่ ถึงวันที่ ๒๔ เม.ย. ๖ ๗

ยูเครนได้สูญเสียอาวุธยุทโธปกรณ์ต่างๆ อย่างจำนวนมากในสงคราม ตามรายงานจากสติถิข้อมูลของกระทรวงกลาโหมรัสเซีย  ดังต่อไปนี้ :-

เครื่องบินรบ                      ๕๙๒               ลำ

เฮลิคอร์ฟเตอร์                  ๒๗๐             เครื่อง

เครื่องบินไร้คนขับ(Drone) ๒๒๙๓๒           ลำ

เครื่องยิงจรวด                   ๕๐๙             เครื่อง

รถถังและรถรบต่างๆ          ๑๕๘๒๗           คัน

รถยิงจรวดหลายลำกล้อง  ๑๒๗๑            ชุด

ปืนใหญ่ปืนครก                 ๙๐๘๑          กระบอก

รถขนส่งและยานพาหนะเทคนิคต่างๆ  ๒๑๒๗๔ เครื่อง

นอกจากนี้ยังสร้างความเสียหายทางด้านพลเรือน มีประชากรบาดเจ็บและเสียชีวิตจากสงครามจำนวนมาก  จากประชากรยูเครนทั้งหมด ๔๔ ล้านคน   เวลานี้ยูเครนเหลือประชากรเพียงครึ่งเดียวในประเทศ  นอกนั้นได้หนีไปลี้ภัยกระจัดกระจายอยู่ตามประเทศต่างๆ ทั่วยุโรป และ ประเทศอื่นๆ  

มีทหารยูเครนเสียขีวิตและบาดเจ็บมากกว่า ๔๔๔๐๐๐ คน  ไม่รวมทหารรับจ้างจากฝ่าย NATO  

บ้านเมืองถูกทำลายย่อยยับกลายเป็นเมืองร้าง ประเทศล่มสลาย ไม่มีอะไรเหลือ ทั้งเศรษฐกิจ สังคม การเมือง ต้องพึ่งพาความช่วยเหลือทุกอย่างจากภายนอก

หลังจาก ๒ ปีผ่านไปรัฐบาล(หุ่นเชิด)ที่กรุงเคียฟ ก็ไม่มีทีท่าว่าจะเจรจาสงบศึก ยังดันทุรังเดินหน้าต่อไปจนกว่ายูเครนจะล่มสลาย... ผู้ที่ต้องรับผืดชอบกับโศกนาฎกรรมเหล่านี้คืออดีดตัวตลกที่เป็นผู้นำยูเครนคนปัจจุบัน และบริวาร

ประเด็น..."ธ.ก.ส." กับโครงการดิจิทัลวอลเล็ตรัฐบาลผสมเพื่อไทย (???)

บีบีซีไทย - BBC Thai 

10h 
 
ปัจจุบันรัฐบาลมียอดคงค้างที่ต้องรับชดเชยค่าใช้จ่ายหรือการสูญเสียรายได้ให้กับ ธ.ก.ส. สูงถึง 8.85 แสนล้านบาท คิดเป็น 83.45% ของยอดคงค้างทั้งหมดในปี 2565
อ่านเพิ่มเติม https://bbc.in/3Qj0KAp
 
May be an image of 1 person, grass and text that says 'GETTYIMAGES GETTY IMAGES ประเมินสถานะการเงิน ธ.ก.ล พร้อมไหมถ้าต้องจ่าย 1.7 แสนล้าน ล้าน โครงการดิจิทัลวอลเล็ต รงการ BBC NEWS ไทย' 

เปิดสภาพคล่องของ ธ.ก.ส. ตรงไหนที่พอเป็นไปได้ ในวันที่ยังไม่มีความชัดเจนว่ารัฐบาลและ ธ.ก.ส. จะจัดสรรงบส่วนใดมารองรับวงเงิน 1.72 แสนล้านบาทนี้ ที่ตั้งขึ้นมาเพื่อช่วยเหลือฝั่งเกษตรกรในโครงการดิจิทัลวอลเล็ต 10,000 บาท (ดูเพิ่ม- 2h 
ธ.ก.ส. มีสภาพคล่อง-สถานะการเงิน แข็งแกร่ง พอไหม อ่านต่อ https://bbc.in/3WfSPHM
1d 
นายจุลพันธ์ อมรวิวัฒน์ รัฐมนตรีช่วยว่าการกระทรวงการคลัง ย้ำว่าจะมีการส่งเรื่องไปยังสำนักงานคณะกรรมการกฤษฎีกาเพื่อตีความ แต่ยืนยันว่าขั้นตอนทั้งหมดนั้นถูกกฎหมาย และ “สภาพคล่อง ธ.ก.ส. มีความมั่นคง”
 
ธ.ก.ส. สถานะการเงินแข็งแกร่งพอไหม สำหรับโครงการดิจิทัลวอลเล็ต - BBC News ไทย

LIVE! #InHerEyes

 

LIVE! #InHerEyes - ปัญญาซนปกป้องแบงก์ชาติทลายทุนผูกขาดแก้ รธน. ตามใจคนเก่ง