The royal road to ruin :ราชาวิถี สู่หายนะ! โลกมองถนนที่สถาบันกษัตริย์ไทยเลือกเดิน มันมุ่งไปสู่ซากปรักหักพัง!!

ราชาวิถี สู่หายนะ!

ราชาวิถี สู่หายนะ! บทความล่าสุด ของ The Economist (26 มค 2558) ตีแผ่ความจริงอันอำมหิตในประเทศไทย ที่มีการใช้กฎหมายหมิ่นกษัตริย์ อย่างรุนแรง จนเป็นภัยร้ายแรงต่อเสรีภาพการแสดงความเห็น

บทความไล่เรียงคดี 112 แทบทุกคดีหนักๆ และชี้ปัญหาสำคัญ ทั้งตัวกฎหมาย การบังคับใช้ และการถูกใช้เป็นเครื่องมือทางการเมือง

บทความยังทิ้งท้ายด้วยว่า "โดยหลักแล้ว เมื่อกษัตริย์ภูมิพลตายลง ก็อาจเป็นโอกาสของช่องเล็กๆ ของการปฏิรูปก็ได้ แต่น่าจะเกิดขึ้นมากกว่า ก็คือ ความกลัวเรื่องอนาคตของสถาบันกษัตริย์ จะทำให้ศาลยิ่งปราบปรามความผิด 112 หนักยิ่งขึ้น"
http://www.economist.com/…/21640686-after-paris-attacks-att…
โลกมองถนนที่สถาบันกษัตริย์ไทยเลือกเดิน มันมุ่งไปสู่ซากปรักหักพัง!!

 คลิก-ดูเพิ่มเติม

The royal road to ruin

In a series following our print article on conflicting approaches to free speech after the terrorist attacks in Paris on January 7th, our correspondents offer more in-depth analysis of the threats to freedom of expression around the world. We start with Thailand.
ALTHOUGH lèse-majesté laws remain on the books in many constitutional monarchies, prosecutions are rare. Thailand is an exception: it enforces them far more assiduously than any other country since Japan canned rules protecting its emperor after the second world war. Anyone who "defames, insults or threatens" the King, his heir, the Queen or a regent risks between three and 15 years in jail. For decades, the number of cases averaged around ten a year, but since 2004, they have soared to several hundred each year, as friction between Thailand's populist governments and its traditional ruling establishment has erupted into conflict.

Related topics

Lèse-majesté complaints are a common way of harassing political rivals. A surge of new cases followed last May's military coup. Anyone can report an offence, and it is not only speech that breaks the rules. In 2011 a 61-year-old received a 20-year sentence for sending four offensive text messages; he denied the charges and died in prison the following year. People who fail to stand for the royal anthem, still played before most film screenings, or deface banknotes, which bear the King's image, have fallen foul of the law. In December complaints of lèse-majesté were made against a woman who wore black clothes on the eve of the King's birthday. In 2008 a series of charges against the BBC included the complaint that its website had allowed the King's image to appear below that of a politician.
Foreigners who break the lèse-majesté law are often swiftly deported, but in recent years more of them have served jail terms. In 2007 Oliver Jufer, a Swiss national, received a ten-year sentence for defacing pictures of the King while drunk (he was pardoned after a month). Shortly afterwards an Australian, Harry Nicolaides, spent more than a year behind bars because one paragraph in a self-published novel contained an unflattering description of the crown prince. In 2012 Joe Gordon, a Thai American, spent 13 months* in prison for translating excerpts of "The King Never Smiles", an English-language biography of the King that is banned in Thailand.
In 2005 King Bhumibol warned supporters that over-zealous implementation of lèse-majesté laws could create problems for the monarchy. The palace regularly issues pardons, particularly if cases are well-publicised and miscreants apologetic, but the volume of prosecutions is moving upwards, all the same. Hard-liners argue that criticism of lèse-majesté laws is itself a crime, which is one reason the plague is so difficult to stop. And cases are poorly covered in the media, for fear of repeating the offence.
In theory the death of King Bhumibol, who is 87 years old, could provide a window for reform. It is more likely that fears about the monarchy's future will prompt the courts to crack down even harder.
*Correction: This article originally stated that Joe Gordon spent seven months in jail. Mr Gordon has been in touch to say that he was jailed on 24 May 2011 and released on 11 July 2012. He adds: "The Thai kangaroo court never allowed bail for me to fight the case. I had only one chance to plead guilty in order to get pardon from King Bhumibol. Otherwise, I could get 20 years imprisonment."

• Criminal sentencing
• Thailand